Invasieve beademing Module 3 Risk-of-bias-tabel

Study reference

(first author, publication year)

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Definitely yes

Probably yes

Probably no

Definitely no

Was the allocation adequately concealed?

Definitely yes

Probably yes

Probably no

Definitely no

Blinding: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Were patients blinded?

Were healthcare providers blinded?

Were data collectors blinded?

Were outcome assssors blinded?

Were data analysts blinded?

Definitely yes

Probably yes

Probably no

Definitely no

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Definitely yes

Probably yes

Probably no

Definitely no

Are reports of the study free of selective outcome reporting?

Definitely yes

Probably yes

Probably no

Definitely no

Was the study apparently free of other problems that could put it at a risk of bias?

Definitely yes

Probably yes

Probably no

Definitely no

Overall risk of bias

If applicable/necessary, per outcome measure

LOW

Some concerns

HIGH

Oguz, 2013

Definitely yes;

Reason:
Patients were assigned to HME filters or HHs, by a random number list generated using Excelsoftware.

Probably yes;

Reason:
Not stated.

Probably no;

Reason:
Not being blinded to both participants and outcomes.

Probably yes;

Reason:
No loss to follow-up. 

Definitely yes;

Reason:
All relevant outcomes were reported.

Definitely yes;

Reason:
No other problems noted.

Some concerns

Not being blinded to both participants and outcomes.