Blaaskatheterisatie Module 1 Quality-assessment-tabel
Table of quality assessment for systematic reviews of RCTs and observational studies
Based on AMSTAR checklist (Shea et al.; 2007, BMC Methodol 7: 10; doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-10) and PRISMA checklist (Moher et al 2009, PLoS Med 6: e1000097; doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097)
|
Study First author, year |
Appropriate and clearly focused question? Yes/no/unclear |
Comprehensive and systematic literature search? Yes/no/unclear |
Description of included and excluded studies? Yes/no/unclear |
Description of relevant characteristics of included studies? Yes/no/unclear |
Appropriate adjustment for potential confounders in observational studies? Yes/no/unclear/not applicable |
Assessment of scientific quality of included studies? Yes/no/unclear |
Enough similarities between studies to make combining them reasonable? Yes/no/unclear |
Potential risk of publication bias taken into account? Yes/no/unclear |
Potential conflicts of interest reported? Yes/no/unclear |
|
Kidd, 2015 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not applicable (observational studies not included) |
Yes |
Yes (heterogeneity was assessed and subgroup analysis performed) |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Ellahi, 2021 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Not applicable (observational studies not included) |
Yes |
Yes (heterogeneity was assessed and subgroup analysis performed) |
Yes |
yes |